翻訳と辞書 ・ Tunsberg Township, Chippewa County, Minnesota
・ Tunsberg Tunnel
・ Tunsbergdalsbreen
・ Tunshi Tiandi 3
・ Tunshill
・ Tunshu
・ Tunstall
・ Tunstall coding
・ Tunstall High School
・ Tunstall Hills
・ Tunstall Priory
・ Tunstall Quarles
・ Tunstall railway station
・ Tunstall Reservoir
・ Tunstall Road
・ Tunstall v Steigmann
・ Tunstall v. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen
・ Tunstall, East Riding of Yorkshire
・ Tunstall, Kent
・ Tunstall, Lancashire
・ Tunstall, Norfolk
・ Tunstall, North Yorkshire
・ Tunstall, Stafford
・ Tunstall, Staffordshire
・ Tunstall, Suffolk
・ Tunstall, Sunderland
・ Tunstall, Virginia
・ Tunstallia
・ Tunstallia (fungus)
・ Tunstallia aculeata
|
|
| Tunstall v Steigmann ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Tunstall v Steigmann
''Tunstall v Steigmann'' () 2 QB 593 is a UK company law case, concerning piercing the corporate veil.
==Facts==
Mrs Steigmann, the landlord, wanted to acquire possession of property which she had leased out to a tenant Mrs Tunstall, so that she could run her own butchery business there. The Landlord and Tenanct Act 1954 section 30(1)(g) prevented landlords who wished to terminate tenancies from opposing a tenant's application for a new tenancy, unless there were exceptional circumstances. An exceptional circumstance under the Act included the landlord wishing to occupy the premises themselves to carry on a new business. Mrs Steigmann had given Mrs Tunstall notice. But then, Mrs Steigmann then decided to incorporate her business. Mrs Tunstall claimed that the company was now carrying on the business, rather than Mrs Steigmann as the landlord. Because the company was a separate legal person, Mrs Tunstall argued that Mrs Steigmann did not have the right to repossession under the statute.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Tunstall v Steigmann」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|